dilluns, 17 de gener del 2022

MUTHEL, Johann Gottfried (1728-1788) - Concerto (Es-Dur) di Joh: Gottfr: Müthel

Anoniem - Plattegrond van Riga (1735)


Johann Gottfried Müthel (1728-1788) - Concerto (fagott, Es-Dur) di Joh: Gottfr: Müthel
Performers: Jennіfer Harrіs (fagott); Katrіn Lazar (fagott); Hofkapelle Hannover; Anne Röhrіg (leitung)

---


German composer. He received his earliest musical instruction from his father, Christian Caspar Müthel (1696-1764), organist at the Nikolaikirche in Mölln, and was later taught by Johann Paul Kunzen (1696-1757) in Lübeck. At the age of 19 he became a chamber musician and organist at the court of Mecklenburg-Schwerin under Duke Christian Ludwig II. A year’s leave of absence allowed Müthel to go to Leipzig in the spring of 1750 to visit ‘the famous Capellmeister and Music-Director Bach … in order to perfect himself in his profession’, as an accompanying letter from his employer stated. Bach was already ill at this time, and it is not known what kind of teaching he was able to give Müthel. After Bach’s death on 28 July 1750, Müthel left for a study tour, visiting J.C. Altnickol in Naumburg, Hasse in Dresden, C.P.E. Bach in Potsdam and Telemann in Hamburg; he was also active as a copyist during this period. In 1753, through the good offices of his brother, he obtained the post of Kapellmeister to the Russian privy councillor O.H. von Vietinghoff in Riga; he was appointed organist of the principal church of Riga in 1767. His friends and admirers in Riga included J.G. Herder. Müthel, who was also highly regarded as a keyboard virtuoso, never seems to have left Riga again; almost nothing is known about his later life. Müthel's output is small, and both musically and technically his keyboard works are the most demanding part of it. However, fewer of the works in the Pretlack Collection, seem to be by Müthel than was originally thought. For instance, C.F. Schale is named elsewhere as composer of the two harpsichord concertos preserved there (see the Kritischer Bericht to the first volume of Wilhelm’s edition of organ works, 1982). The extract from a letter by Müthel which occurs in the German translation (1773/R) of Burney’s The Present State of Music in Germany, the Netherlands, and United Provinces should therefore be taken seriously, although it sounds like a typical effusion of the ars poetica of the Sturm und Drang period: ‘I have devised many a piece when in good humour and a cheerful mood, but only in outline, and the pieces await a happy disposition of my mind for further work to be done, for I do not care to work when I am not disposed to it. And that true cheerfulness of mind I require to work visits me only rarely’. Particularly in the inner movements of his compositions, Müthel’s characteristic originality watchword gave rise to rhythmically striking motifs and phrases, abrupt changes of dynamics, and other expressive means, all in the service of individual self-expression. His style has something in common with the styles of C.P.E. Bach and other experimentally minded composers of his generation. Burney wrote of him: ‘The style of this composer more resembles that of Emanuel Bach, than any other. But the passages are entirely his own, and reflect as much honour upon his head as his hand’.

Cap comentari:

Publica un comentari a l'entrada